on Dezember 9 | in Casino | by wertuslash | with No Comments

The License terms were rewritten to attempt to ensure that international laws will interpret the license as FSF intends. If you'd like to advertise your use of a particular license,feel free to use one of our logos. If you might be interested in joining up with theGNU Project in this way, please see our GNU software evaluation page for moreinformation and a short questionnaire. It is also possible to make your program a GNU package, a part of theGNU Project.

Licenses For Documentation

• The free software movement has come a long way in forty years.
• A larger program usuallyought to be copyleft; but if you are set on using a lax permissivelicense for one, we recommend the Apache 2.0 license since it protectsusers from patent treachery.
• This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
• A larger programusually ought to be copyleft; but if you are set on a lax permissivelicense for one, we recommend the Apache 2.0 license since it protectsusers from patent treachery.
• This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatiblewith the GNU GPL.
• It has a weak per-file copyleft(like version 1 of the Mozilla Public License) which makes itincompatible with the GNU GPL.

We will avoidusing software under this license, as we do all other nonfree software. In somecountries, users that download code with no license may infringecopyright merely by compiling it or running it. For the samereason, we have avoided naming the programs for which a license is used,unless we think that for specific reasons it won't backfire. There is no way we could list all the known nonfree softwarelicenses here; after all, every proprietary software company has itsown.
This is the license used throughout the GNU and FSF web sites.This license provides much the same permissions as our verbatimcopying license, but it's much more detailed. This was the license used throughout the GNU web site for manyyears. Works that express someone's opinion—memoirs, editorials, andso on—serve a fundamentally different purpose than works forpractical use like software and documentation. Neither we nor SILrecommend the use of this license for anything other thanfonts.
Since a simple Hello World programwill satisfy the requirement, it is harmless. Its only unusual requirement isthat when selling the font, you must redistribute it bundled withsome software, rather than alone. This is acceptable for fonts as fonts can bealiased or renamed using free software tools, but it's very annoyingand could be overly burdensome in other contexts. It has an unfortunate condition requiring that derivative worksnot use or include the name of the original work as a program name,font name or file name.

Licenses for Fonts

This is a copyleft free software license, incompatible with theGPL. This is a free and copyleft betory casino bonus license meant for general data.Please don't use it for software or documentation, since it isincompatible with the GNU GPL and with the GNU FDL; however, it isfine to use for other kinds of data. This license does not qualify as free, because there arerestrictions on distributing modified versions. It is a copyleft free documentation licenseprovided the copyright holder does not exercise any ofthe “LICENSE OPTIONS” listed in Section VI of the license.But if either of the options is invoked, the license becomesnonfree.

Various Licenses and Comments about Them

The following licensesare free software licenses, butare notcompatible with the GNU GPL. If you want a lax permissivelicense for a small program, we recommendthe X11 license. The license does provide the ability to licensepatents along with the software work, however, we still recommend theApache 2.0 license for avoiding patent treachery when choosing to putyour work under a lax license. Ifyou want to use a lax permissive license for your project, please useExpat license for a small program and the Apache2.0 license for a substantial program.
This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license,compatible with the GNU GPL. The patent termination provision is a good thing, whichis why we recommend the Apache 2.0 license for substantial programsover other lax permissive licenses. One of the reasons that FSF released GPLv3, is an attempt to clarify what constitutions a "work based on another work" which triggers the licenses copyleft obligations to share the new software under the terms of the GPLv3 license.

• Our comments about the Modified BSD licenseapply to this license too.
• If you work, the best time to negotiate permission to release freesoftware is when negotiating your employment agreement.
• It is incompatible because Section (2c) says “Youadd no other terms or conditions to those of this License”, andthe GNU FDL has additional terms not accounted for in the CommonDocumentation License.
• Section 3.3 provides indirectcompatibility between this license and the GNU GPL version 2.0, theGNU LGPL version 2.1, the GNU AGPL version 3, and all later versionsof those licenses.
• You are welcome to use any of our licenses even if your programis not a GNU package; indeed, we hope you will.

We have not written a full analysis of this license, but it is a freesoftware license, with less stringent requirements on distribution thanLPPL 1.2 (described next). (Of course, any program ispotentially threatened by patents, and the only way to end that is tochange patent law to make software safe from patents.) It has a special danger in the form of a term expressly stating itdoes not grant you any patent licenses, with an invitation to buysome. It also, indirectly, allows relicensing to GPLversion 3 or any later version, because there is a way to relicenseto the CeCILL v2, and the CeCILL v2 gives a way to relicense to anyversion of the GNU GPL.

The license notices

Our comments there apply here as well; this is aGPL-incompatible, partial copyleft free software license. It is a non-copyleft freesoftware license which is incompatible with the GNU GPL, and has practical problemslike those of the original BSD license. This is a free software license, not a strong copyleft, which isincompatible with the GNU GPL because of details rather than anymajor policy. This is a non-copyleft free software license which is incompatible withthe GNU GPL. The combination results in a copyleft free softwarelicense that is incompatible with the GNU GPL.

Versioning

We would like to list all free software programs in the FreeSoftware Directory, including all programs licensed under the GPL (anyversion). If you have copied code from other programs covered by the samelicense, copy their copyright notices too. Ifthe developer is refusing users patent licenses, the program is ineffect a trap for users and users should avoid the program. If that is not possible for anyreason, CC0 also provides a lax, permissive license as a fallback.Both public domain works and the lax license provided by CC0 arecompatible with the GNU GPL.
Like all CClicenses, it shouldnot be used on software. For works of software it is not recommended, asCC0 has a term expressly stating it does not grant you any patent licenses. This is an unreasonable condition to place onusers' rights, so the license is nonfree. It requires you to publish thesource code publicly whenever you “Deploy” the coveredsoftware, and “Deploy” is defined to include many kinds ofprivate use. The original Squeak license, as applied to software, is not a freesoftware license because it requires all users in whatever country toobey US export control laws.
You are welcome to use any of our licenses even if your programis not a GNU package; indeed, we hope you will. For example, if your program is a webapplication, its interface could display a “Source” link thatleads users to an archive of the code. For interactive programs, it is usually a good idea to make theprogram display a brief notice about copyright and copying permissionwhen it starts up. If a release has one statement that “This program is releasedunder license FOO,” in a central place such as the README file,that makes the situation clear for that release. Please note that, since theLGPL is a set of additional permissions on top of the GPL, it's crucialto include both licenses so users have all the materials they need tounderstand their rights.

Software Licenses

Section 9.4 of the CeCILL commits the program's developers to certainforms of cooperation with the users, if someone attacks the programwith a patent. The X11 license and the modified BSD license aremore or less equivalent. To avoid this risk, you can suggest the X11 licenseinstead.

« Offizielle Webseite für Spiele & Sportwetten online Reliable Online Casino on Money »